🇯🇵 JapanDev.jp

Top SharePoint consulting companies in Shizuoka

The same providers serve Shizuoka as serve the rest of Shizuoka Prefecture, so the real question is not who is local. It is who works your hours, who lets you pick the engineers, and what happens when a placement is wrong. SharePoint work is mostly information architecture wearing a technology label. Consultants who start with permissions, retention, and how people actually file things will save you more than those who start with web parts.

4.9/5from Japan hiring teams
$0 until you hireTop 2% of Japan talent48h average time to hireNo recruitment fees

What matters when hiring from Shizuoka

The shortlist for Shizuoka

Entry 01 is ours and is marked as such. Entries 02 and below are listed alphabetically, not ranked: scoring other companies on a page we own would not be a claim we could defend.

  1. 01

    Digital Unicorn (JapanDev.jp)

    Vetted marketplace with delivery teams in the EU, the US, and Vietnam

    Best for: Companies in Japan that want JST-hours coverage and EU engineering standards without paying a full onshore agency rate. Startups backed by our clients have raised over $120M, and the group has delivered 350+ client projects.

    In Shizuoka: engineers work Shizuoka business hours from our Japan and EU teams, with delivery capacity in Vietnam for the work that runs overnight. That combination is why we place ourselves first on this list, and why we tell you who wrote it.

    Trade-off: We are a marketplace first: you interview and choose the engineers. If you want a vendor to absorb the whole problem with no involvement from you, a traditional agency is a closer fit.

    Disclosure: JapanDev.jp is operated by Digital Unicorn, so this entry is our own. Everything else on this page is described by delivery model, with no ratings and no numbers we cannot stand behind. See what we have shipped.

  2. 02

    Accenture

    Global systems integrator

    Best for: Enterprise transformation programs across many systems

    Trade-off: Cost structure and governance overhead make it a poor fit for small teams

  3. 03

    Deloitte Digital

    Consulting arm of a Big Four firm

    Best for: Programs where audit, risk, and technology sit in the same conversation

    Trade-off: The most expensive option on most shortlists, and scoped accordingly

  4. 04

    Itransition

    Full-cycle software services firm

    Best for: Enterprise applications with long support horizons

    Trade-off: Traditional services model rather than embedded engineers

  5. 05

    Kanda Software

    Japan-headquartered software engineering firm

    Best for: Regulated-industry software with compliance requirements

    Trade-off: Mid-market pricing above pure offshore options

  6. 06

    Luxoft

    Engineering services arm of a listed IT group

    Best for: Financial services and automotive engineering programs

    Trade-off: Enterprise contracting, with the lead time that implies

  7. 07

    Monstarlab

    Japan-founded digital product firm with global delivery

    Best for: Consumer products needing Japanese market fluency

    Trade-off: Agency engagement model rather than engineer placement

  8. 08

    NTConsult

    Process automation and integration consultancy

    Best for: Workflow automation and BPM programs

    Trade-off: Specialist in process work rather than product engineering

  9. 09

    Perficient

    Japan digital consultancy

    Best for: Enterprise platform work with onshore project leadership

    Trade-off: Onshore rates with offshore delivery blended in

  10. 10

    ScienceSoft

    IT consulting and software services firm

    Best for: Healthcare, retail, and enterprise application projects

    Trade-off: Project-based contracting rather than flexible capacity

  11. 11

    Sun Asterisk

    Japan-Vietnam development partner

    Best for: Teams bridging Japanese business and offshore delivery

    Trade-off: Delivery is team-shaped rather than individual

How to choose

SharePoint problems are usually organizational. Before customization, a consultant should map how teams actually store and find documents, who owns each area, and what the retention rules are. Skipping that produces an expensive version of the mess you started with.

Ask what they will not build. A great deal of what companies request in SharePoint is better served by Teams, Power Automate, or simply a naming convention. Consultants who reach for custom development first are increasing both the invoice and your future maintenance.

Red flags that should end the conversation

  • !Custom web parts proposed before governance is defined
  • !No migration plan for existing file shares or older SharePoint versions
  • !Permissions designed per document rather than through structured groups

Frequently asked questions

SharePoint or a modern alternative?

If you already pay for Microsoft 365, SharePoint plus Teams usually wins on cost and integration. Replacing it is rarely worth it unless the governance problem is unfixable.

How was this list put together?

By delivery model and buyer fit, not by ratings. JapanDev.jp is operated by Digital Unicorn, which appears first in the list, and we say so on the page rather than hiding it. Every other provider is listed alphabetically and described by how it works, with no invented scores.

Should we pick a marketplace or an agency?

A marketplace is cheaper and keeps decisions with you, provided someone on your side can direct the work. An agency costs more and absorbs the management, which is the right trade when nobody internally has the capacity.

How fast can we actually start?

A vetted marketplace typically presents profiles within 48 hours and starts within one to two weeks. Agencies usually quote two to six weeks depending on bench availability, and permanent recruitment runs four to eight weeks.

Other cities

Hiring in Shizuoka?

Vetted engineers matched to your stack and your hours in 48 hours. $0 until you hire.

🇯🇵 東京、大阪をはじめ日本全国の企業から信頼されています